![]() ![]() With Wavestate wave sequencing, you are choosing from a variety of different samples per step, and those samples can be changed out in real time as the sequencers (plural) play back the wave sequence. The nature of the original sample the wavetable is constructed from determines the variety of sounds that are produced in the final wavetable, and you have a range of controls that determine time, speed, scanning process and direction you can use in real time or with modulation to alter the sound produced by the wavetable. It’s different in that with MWXT (or Quantum Wavetable), you are scanning through one, analyzed and algorithmically constructed sample that produces a wavetable of gradually differentiated sounds. It’s similar in that you are, with wave sequencing, scanning through a “table” of selected waveforms that - given the scanning parameters chosen - provide an evolution of sound over time. Is Wavestate similar to Waldorf Wave XT ?You mean Microwave XT. Thanks and apologies if I have completely overlooked something obvious - I'm sort-of hoping that I have! ![]() 'PERFORMANCE' - made up of up to 4 'LAYERS'Doesn't that mean that the Wavestate, at 'PERFORMANCE' level is only capable of playing the equivalent of 1 x Wavestation 'PATCH' (albeit a maxed-out 'PATCH') at a time? 'LAYER' - which in turn contains 1 'PROGRAM' - made up of just 1 wave or wavesequence I have to say I am very impressed with what I've heard of the Wavestate demos so far (not to mention the ease of control and programming from the control surface, and the advantages of Wavesequencing 2.0, plus the extended wave set and filters etc.), so I can only assume that I have simply misunderstood the Wavestate structure - but it appears, at least to me, that it's a: 'PERFORMANCE' - made up of up to 8 'PATCHES' (but, really, usually up to about 4 'PATCHES' in reality)and on the Wavestation, generally 'PERFORMANCES' are what players will actually play as opposed to 'PATCHES'. 'PATCH' - made up of 1, 2 or 4 waves or wavesequences On the Wavestation (and on the VST) you have a: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |